Teacher self-view & wishes teachers in from the start
Every teacher has their own allocation view and can submit wishes for subjects, classes, hours and comments — leadership sees them in the workbench. Johnson, Kraft & Papay (2012) show teachers with real influence over subjects and classes have both higher job satisfaction and better pupil outcomes.
Teacher self-view
Each teacher sees their current and upcoming allocation at /teacher/min-fagfordeling.
Structured wish form
Subject, class, hours and a free-text comment — not a long unstructured email.
Wishes in the workbench
Leadership sees wishes as a layer over the allocation — right where the decision is made.
Status per wish
Granted, partial, rejected — the teacher gets feedback without having to ask.
Hit-rate as KPI
Schools can track how many wishes are granted year over year.
Wellbeing through inclusion
Teachers heard before the decision feel more ownership of the allocation.
In the classroom
Spring round
Open the wish window in March — close it before allocation starts in April.
New teacher
A new teacher can wish from day one — not only after the first year.
Negotiation
Unanswered wishes surface in validation — so they aren't lost.
For teachers and for school leadership
You don't have to wait for leadership to ask. In your self-view you submit wishes for subjects, classes, hours and comments — and see status (granted/partial/rejected) together with an official reasoning. EVA (2021) shows precisely that kind of inclusion correlates with higher wellbeing.
- Structured wishes per subject and class — not a long email
- Official response status with reasoning
- Wish for next year right from day one of employment
Wishes are no longer loose emails in your inbox. They sit as a layer on top of the allocation, right where the decision is made, and unmet wishes trigger a warning in the validation module — so no teacher loses their voice in the puzzle.
- Wishes show as a layer on top of the workbench
- Unmet wishes trigger a warning in validation
- Hit rate is logged as a KPI year over year
Works with
Research base
The teacher-wish loop is grounded in international research on staff voice and Danish wellbeing surveys.
- Johnson, S. M., Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers' working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students' achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39
- Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut (EVA) (2021). Lærernes arbejdsmiljø og trivsel i folkeskolen. EVA source
- Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Learning Policy Institute source
- Loeb, S., Darling-Hammond, L., & Luczak, J. (2005). How teaching conditions predict teacher turnover in California schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 80(3), 44–70
- Hargreaves, A., & O'Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative Professionalism: When Teaching Together Means Learning for All. Corwin
- Danmarks Evalueringsinstitut (EVA) (2018). Skoleledelsens arbejde med fagfordeling og kompetencedækning. EVA source
Frequently asked questions
Ready to try it?
Get a free demo for your school — we'll show you the whole platform in 30 minutes.

